ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2025
Pathophysiological hypotheses of the triad in abusive infant shaking: A systematic review and analysis of corroborated cases.
Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spread of "triad diagnostics" in suspected Shaken Baby Syndrome.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Article
- Reconsidering Pathophysiological pathways in abusive infant shaking: Questions beyond the triad.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subdural hemorrhage, retinal hemorrhages, and encephalopathy are associated with the medical diagnosis of abusive head trauma. These findings have also been observed in children exposed to admitted or witnessed shaking. There are various suggested mechanisms behind these findings. One mechanism is exclusive to intentional shaking, while the other suggested mechanisms are compatible with both intentional and accidental violence as well as an underlying illness. We performed a systematic literature review of case reports on triad findings with subsequent analysis on the empirical consequences of three mechanistic hypotheses: (1) the outcome components arise independently following acceleration-deceleration forces during shaking; (2) the outcome components are partially dependent and caused by pathophysiological mediators following hypoxia caused by damage to the brainstem or cervical spinal cord by shaking; (3) the outcome factors are partially dependent and are caused by re-bleeding triggered by shaking in chronic subdural hematoma. From a total of 9628 articles, we identified twelve publications including in total 100 cases that met the inclusion criteria. We identified no sufficiently detailed case report, but nine cases had information that allowed for tentative testing of the hypotheses. Three cases had findings consistent with that triad findings are partially dependent and related to chronic subdural re-bleeding (hypothesis 3), whereas no case provided support for the other hypotheses. Thus, published cases do not provide the information needed to understand the mechanism underlying triad findings in infants subjected to shaking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.