Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40672111›Full record

ArticleEcological indicators2025

Charting a course for freshwater biomonitoring: The grand challenges identified by the global scientific community.

Adam G Yates, Robert B Brua, Joseph M Culp, Francisca C Aguiar, Anila P Ajayan, Thomas Aspin, Mirco Bundschuh, Mirian R Calderón, Zoltán Csabai, Helen Dallas and 36 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological indicators, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

46 authors.

Adam G YatesDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Canada.
Robert B BruaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, National Hydrology Research Centre, Canada.
Joseph M CulpCold Regions Research Centre, GES and Department of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada.
Francisca C AguiarForest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Portugal.
Anila P AjayanRubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, the United States of America.
Thomas AspinEnvironment Agency, United Kingdom.
Mirco BundschuhiES Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), Landau, Germany.
Mirian R CalderónINQUISAL-CONICET, Facultad de Química, Bioquímica Y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Argentina.
Zoltán CsabaiUniversity of Péecs, Department of Hydrobiology, Pécs, Hungary.
Helen DallasFreshwater Research Center, South Africa.
Thibault DatryNational Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment, Riverly, France.
Karina Dias SilvaUniversidade Federal do Pará, Brazil.
Jean DzaviResearch Centre for Water and Climate Change, Institute of Geological and Mining Research, Cameroon.
Judy EnglandEnvironment Agency, United Kingdom.
Tibor ErősHUN-REN Balaton Limnological Research Institute, Tihany, Hungary.
Daniel GeblerPoznan University of Life Sciences, Poland.
Willem GoedkoopDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
Alexia Maria González-FerrerasIHCantabria - Instituto de Hidráulica Ambiental de La Universidad de Cantabria, C/Isabel Torres 15, 39011 Santander, Spain.
David P HamiltonAustralian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Queensland 4111, Australia.
Robert M HughesOregon State University & Amnis Opes Institute, United States of America.
Leandro JuenUniversidade Federal do Pará, Brazil.
Ben J KeffordCentre for Applied Water Science, Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Australia.
Ricardo KoroivaUniversidade Federal do Pará, Brazil.
Edward M KrynakWashington State Department of Ecology, the United States of America.
Isabelle LavoieInstitut national de la recherche scientifique, Centre Eau Terre Environnement, Canada.
Jennifer LentoCanadian Rivers Institute and University of New Brunswick, Canada.
Raphael LigeiroUniversidade Federal do Pará, Brazil.
Renato T MartinsInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Brazil.
Frank O MaseseDepartment of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, University of Eldoret, Kenya.
Luciano Fogaça de Assis MontagUniversidade Federal do Pará, Brazil.
Jordan Musetta-LambertEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, National Hydrology Research Centre, Canada.
Kristin J PainterUniversity of Saskatchewan, School of Environment and Sustainability, Canada.
Sandra PoikaneEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Andreu RicoCavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, Spain.
Renata RuaroFederal Technological University of Paraná, Brazil.
Sergi SabaterUniversity of Girona and Catalan Institute for Water Research, Spain.
Thaisa Sala MichelanUniversidade Federal do Pará, Brazil.
Jonas SchoelynckUniversity of Antwerp, Belgium.
Nathan J SmuckerU. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, the United States of America.
Igor StankovićJosip Juray Strossmayer Water Institute, Croatia.
Rachel StubbingtonNottingham Trent University, United Kingdom.
Heidi van DeventerCouncil for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), South Africa.
Lara van NiekerkCouncil for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), South Africa.
Paul J Van den BrinkWageningen University, the Netherlands.
Gábor VárbíróHUN_REN Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Hungary.
Elizabeth W WanderiKenya Fisheries Service, Kenya.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past 50 years have seen biomonitoring emerge as an essential means of generating the knowledge needed to inform protection and restoration of freshwater ecosystems. Despite the successes of biomonitoring, most freshwater ecosystems remain unmonitored. Moreover, degradation of freshwaters continues at a rapid rate with new threats and novel stressors emerging that are difficult to assess using existing techniques. New technologies and techniques have been developed to improve biomonitoring, but application has been slow and integration with existing approaches is often problematic. Clearly, freshwater biomonitoring faces many important challenges that must be addressed to meet management needs of the coming decades. We identify Grand Challenges facing freshwater biomonitoring with the aim of encouraging research and practice to address these challenges. We asked 256 biomonitoring scientists from around the globe to identify what they considered the most important challenges. From their submissions we established five Grand Challenges and 18 associated subchallenges. For each Grand Challenge, we outline the current state of biomonitoring practice and suggest promising pathways and approaches to address them. By identifying and describing these challenges, we strive to position freshwater biomonitoring to take advantage of emerging opportunities and enhance its capacity to meet current and future management needs.

Indexed as

Construct infrastructureDevelop protocolsEmpower communitiesEnsure FAIR dataHolistic ecological context

Identifiers

PMID40672111
PMCPMC12261523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.