ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
Automated machine learning predicts liver metastases in patients with early-onset gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of early-onset gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) is increasing, with liver metastases often occurring early and adversely affecting prognosis. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for liver metastases detection in patients with early-onset GEP-NETs (<50 years) using an automated machine learning (AutoML) approach. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with early-onset GEP-NETs [2000-2021] using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were randomly divided into a training set (n=8,983) and a validation set (n=3,819) in a 7:3 ratio. A nomogram-based scoring system was constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and logistic regression. AutoML was applied to build predictive models using gradient boosting machine (GBM), generalized linear model (GLM), deep learning (DL), and distributed random forest (DRF) algorithms. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC), calibration, decision curve analysis (DCA), and interpretability tools including SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), partial dependence plots (PDPs), and locally interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) plots. Results: A total of 12,802 patients were included, of whom 1,187 (9.3%) developed liver metastases, comprising 851 (9.5%) and 336 (8.8%) cases in the training and validation sets, respectively. Comparative analyses demonstrated that the AutoML models outperformed traditional logistic regression models, with the GBM algorithm achieving the highest performance. The GBM model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.961 in the training set and 0.953 in the validation set. Tumor location was identified as the most important predictor in the GBM model, followed by surgery, tumor size, chemotherapy, and T-staging. Conclusions: The AutoML model leveraging the GBM algorithm provides a robust and clinically valuable tool for the early prediction of liver metastases in patients with early-onset GEP-NETs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.