ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
Treatment discontinuation associated with perioperative toxicity of FLOT versus XELOX chemotherapy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: prospective randomized trial (PECORINO).
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04937738 (Treatment Discontinuation Associated With Perioperative Toxicity of FLOT Versus XELOX Chemotherapy in Patient With Resectable Gastric Cancer; Phase 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment Discontinuation Associated With Perioperative Toxicity of FLOT Versus XELOX Chemotherapy in Patient With Resectable Gastric Cancer; Phase 2
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gastric cancer, what's new from International Gastric Cancer Congress (IGCC) in Amsterdam: a scientific report from Salerno 2025 conference.Ecancermedicalscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer represents a significant global health burden, necessitating effective multimodal treatment approaches. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has gained prominence in improving outcomes, with FLOT (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) and XELOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) emerging as potential regimens. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant FLOT and XELOX in resectable gastric cancer. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized open-label clinical trial. Sixty-nine patients with resectable gastric cancer were randomly assigned to perioperative 8 cycles of FLOT and 8 cycles of XELOX and curative surgery. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who fully adhered to all the allocated treatment per protocol. Secondary endpoints were pathological regression grade, progression-free survival, overall survival, chemotherapy and surgery complications rates. Results: A total of 69 patients were included in both arms. Thirty-three of 35 (94.3%) patients in the FLOT arm and 23 of 34 (67.6%) in the XELOX arm underwent curative-intent surgery after neoadjuvant treatment. Nineteen (54.3%) and 17 (50%) patients completed the protocol-defined therapy in the FLOT and XELOX arms, respectively (P=0.81). The proportion alive without progression at 2 years was 18.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.9-39.8%] in the XELOX group compared to 45.7% (95% CI: 31.9-65.6%) in the FLOT group. The study was prematurely terminated due to the inferiority of the XELOX regimen in preoperative settings because of the high rate of disease progression. Conclusions: In our study, the rate of protocol completion did not statistically differ between the two groups. Perioperative FLOT chemotherapy exhibits notable efficacy in gastric cancer management, as evidenced by favorable treatment responses and surgical outcomes. The regimen's safety profile aligns with established expectations. This study supports the continued exploration of FLOT as a valuable component in the perioperative care of gastric cancer patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04937738.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.