Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40672044›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2025

Refining Intra-Arterial Therapy Selection for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Deep Learning Approach Based on Covariate Interaction Analysis.

Chao An, Lei Li, Yang Luo, Mengxuan Zuo, Wendao Liu, Chengzhi Li, Peihong Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chao An *Department of Minimal Invasive Intervention, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-1096-4183
Lei Li *Department of Interventional Radiology, Qingdao Central Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Central Hospital), Qingdao, Shandong, 266042, People's Republic of China.
Yang Luo *School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Mengxuan ZuoDepartment of Minimal Invasive Intervention, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Wendao LiuDepartment of Interventional Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Chengzhi LiDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Peihong WuDepartment of Minimal Invasive Intervention, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major global health burden, with most patients presenting at advanced stages, limiting treatment options to intra-arterial therapy (IAT) such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). However, optimizing IAT selection for large HCC remains challenging due to tumor heterogeneity and varying patient responses. Aim: To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model for guidance of decision-making between TACE and HAIC for unresectable HCC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multi-center study involving 900 patients with large HCC treated with IATs. The DEep Learning for Interaction and Covariate Analysis in Intra-arterial Therapy SElection (DELICAITE) model integrates deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) with covariate interaction analysis. The model was trained on dual-modal clinical and imaging data to predict treatment response and was validated using prospective and independent external validation cohorts. Results: The DELICAITE model demonstrated superior discriminative ability and accuracy in predicting progressive disease (PD) in both internal and external test sets, with AUCs of 0.756, 0.664, and 0.701, respectively. Patients classified by the model into the "Maintain" group showed significantly longer overall survival (OS) compared to the "Alter" group (11.3 months vs 8.1 months, Conclusion: The DELICAITE model provides a precise and innovative approach to refine IAT schemes for large HCC, offering clinicians a reliable tool to select the most suitable treatment option and potentially improve patient survival outcomes.

Indexed as

deep learninghepatocellular carcinomaintra-arterial therapiesoverall survivalprogressive disease

Identifiers

PMID40672044
PMCPMC12264350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.