ArticleCureus2025
Foreign Body Ingestion Experience in a Tertiary Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Analysis of risk factors associated with surgical treatment for children with foreign body ingestion.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Foreign body ingestion is a common pediatric emergency that can lead to significant morbidity. Understanding the patterns, management approaches, and outcomes of these cases is crucial for optimal patient care. This study aims to analyze the prevalence, management strategies, outcomes, and associated factors of foreign body ingestion cases in children presenting to the King Saud Medical City over a five-year period. Methods This analytical retrospective chart review study examined medical records of 203 pediatric patients (aged 0-18 years) who presented with foreign body ingestion between January 2018 and December 2023. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Results The majority of patients were aged 3-5 years (44.3%) and male (59.1%). Coins were the most commonly ingested objects (50.2%), followed by batteries (18.2%). Most foreign bodies were located in the esophagus (61.1%). Endoscopic removal was the primary intervention (70.9%), with a successful removal rate of 81.8%. Playing with small objects (84.7%) and a lack of supervision (75.4%) were the most common risk factors. Complete resolution was achieved in 95% of cases, with 70.4% requiring medical intervention. Conclusions Foreign body ingestion in children shows a favorable prognosis when managed appropriately. Early detection and intervention, primarily through endoscopic removal, lead to successful outcomes. Prevention strategies should focus on parental supervision and limiting access to small objects, particularly in children aged 3-5 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.