ArticleCureus2025
Testing Pooled Specimens With the Abbott Alinity m STI Assay: Four Years' Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Alinity m STI assay (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL, USA) is designed for the qualitative detection of
methodsWe performed a two-part study, including a preliminary validation on 13 well-known positive samples before and after pooling, as well as a retrospective analysis of 5324 pooled specimens collected between 2021 and 2024. All samples were tested for CT/NG detection, and a subset (n = 277) for MG detection on the Alinity m STI system.
resultsThe preliminary validation showed consistent results without inhibition. Out of 5324 specimens of the retrospective analysis for CT/NG detection, 966 pooled samples (18.1%) were positive: 363 (6.8%) for CT, 479 (9.0%) for NG, and 124 (2.3%) for both CT and NG. Only 95 (1.8%) tests were completely inhibited. A total of 277 specimens were additionally tested for MG. Pooled specimens also allowed MG detection (n = 195; 70.4%) with few inhibited results (n = 3; 1.0%).
conclusionsThis study proves that pooled specimens are rarely inhibited and can be helpful for laboratories where the number of specimens per patient is restricted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.