ArticleCureus2025
Impact of Telehealth on Pediatric Direct Primary Care: Is Virtually Showing Up Valuable?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDirect primary care (DPC) is a transformative alternative to the fee-for-service insurance-based model, offering unlimited patient access for a monthly fee. With growing interest in DPC within pediatrics, our primary objectives were to evaluate how increased access through DPC influences multimodal telehealth utilization and assess its potential to reduce in-person care encounters and costs, including office, urgent care, and emergency department (ED) visits.
methodsA cross-sectional electronic member survey of a multi-physician pediatric DPC network was distributed in April 2023, which assessed the utilization and impact of telehealth modalities and their ability to avoid in-person healthcare visits. Data from the chargemaster of a nearby children's hospital were used as a proxy for the mean costs of pediatric office, urgent care, and ED visits to calculate cost savings for members.
resultsThere were 59 parent responses out of 155 for a response rate of 38%; 100% (59/59) reported texting questions to their doctor, 93% sent pictures to the doctor, 88% directly telephoned the doctor, and 22% used video chat. The minimum mean healthcare expenditure avoided by utilizing telehealth modalities is $1,171.13 per year per family. Patient satisfaction with the DPC model demonstrated a Net Promoter Score (NPS) of 98/100.
conclusionOur study demonstrates that utilization of telehealth modalities in DPC reduces the frequency of in-person office, urgent care, and ED visits and leads to family cost savings. These findings offer valuable insight for healthcare agencies and professional societies developing policies to support pediatric DPC as a sustainable model that delivers value to families, employers, and payers alike. Limitations include regional cost variations and unspecified total avoided visits, and the number of pediatric patients per family. This may result in an underestimation of family savings. Further research should include a larger sample size with clear specifications on the number of visits avoided and the number of pediatric patients treated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.