Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40672001›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Impact of Telehealth on Pediatric Direct Primary Care: Is Virtually Showing Up Valuable?

Austin Lee, Nicholas G Belt, Keili Mistovich, R Justin Mistovich, Andrew Hertz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Austin LeeOrthopedic Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, USA.
Nicholas G BeltOrthopedic Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, USA.
Keili MistovichPediatrics, Zest Pediatrics, Cleveland, USA.
R Justin MistovichOrthopedic Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, USA.
Andrew HertzPediatrics, Zest Pediatrics, Cleveland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDirect primary care (DPC) is a transformative alternative to the fee-for-service insurance-based model, offering unlimited patient access for a monthly fee. With growing interest in DPC within pediatrics, our primary objectives were to evaluate how increased access through DPC influences multimodal telehealth utilization and assess its potential to reduce in-person care encounters and costs, including office, urgent care, and emergency department (ED) visits.

methodsA cross-sectional electronic member survey of a multi-physician pediatric DPC network was distributed in April 2023, which assessed the utilization and impact of telehealth modalities and their ability to avoid in-person healthcare visits. Data from the chargemaster of a nearby children's hospital were used as a proxy for the mean costs of pediatric office, urgent care, and ED visits to calculate cost savings for members.

resultsThere were 59 parent responses out of 155 for a response rate of 38%; 100% (59/59) reported texting questions to their doctor, 93% sent pictures to the doctor, 88% directly telephoned the doctor, and 22% used video chat. The minimum mean healthcare expenditure avoided by utilizing telehealth modalities is $1,171.13 per year per family. Patient satisfaction with the DPC model demonstrated a Net Promoter Score (NPS) of 98/100.

conclusionOur study demonstrates that utilization of telehealth modalities in DPC reduces the frequency of in-person office, urgent care, and ED visits and leads to family cost savings. These findings offer valuable insight for healthcare agencies and professional societies developing policies to support pediatric DPC as a sustainable model that delivers value to families, employers, and payers alike. Limitations include regional cost variations and unspecified total avoided visits, and the number of pediatric patients per family. This may result in an underestimation of family savings. Further research should include a larger sample size with clear specifications on the number of visits avoided and the number of pediatric patients treated.

Indexed as

community pediatricscost savingdirect primary carehealthcare financetelehealth services

Identifiers

PMID40672001
PMCPMC12265844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.