ReviewCureus2025
Timing and Protocols for Microbiome Intervention in Surgical Patients: A Literature Review of Current Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Preoperative oral carbohydrate administration in adult elective surgery: protocol heterogeneity, regional practice patterns and evidence gaps-a scoping review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- The microbiome across the prostate disease continuum: from health and BPH to prostatitis/CPPS and cancer.Oncogene · 2026Review
- Perioperative Probiotic Supplementation to Reduce Postoperative Infection and Inflammation in Children and Neonates Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The gut microbiome in colorectal anastomotic leakage: from mechanisms to precision.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Multimodal Prehabilitation for Hernia Repair: Linking Metabolic Modulation and Mechanical Methods.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Managing the gut microbiome with a personalized approach can significantly improve surgical outcomes, leading to reduced risk of infections, improved immune function, faster recovery and healing, and decreased risk of postoperative complications. This review explores microbiome-based interventions, such as probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation, and their roles in perioperative, preoperative, and postoperative care. Electronic databases, such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, were searched using topic-related keywords and MeSH terms. The literature search was limited to English-language peer-reviewed articles within the last 10 years, but the majority of the literature was from the last five years. Microbiome interventions have been associated with reduced postoperative complications and enhanced recovery times. The study found that changing the gut microbiome in specific ways, like using probiotics and synbiotics before and after surgery, can lead to better surgical results. For example, these treatments can lower the risk of infection at the surgery site by 40%-80% compared to standard care, help patients recover their bowel function one to two days faster, and reduce hospital stays by up to 30%. They also decrease levels of important inflammation markers like IL-6 and CRP. Using probiotics and synbiotics before surgery and continuing them for two weeks can lower infection rates and enhance recovery while managing inflammation. The beneficial effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics support their use as effective strategies in perioperative care. However, people react differently to probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics because of factors like genetics, age, hormonal differences between sexes, and variations in gut microbiota based on race. Future research should focus on developing personalized microbiome-based interventions and establishing standardized protocols tailored to individual patient characteristics to enhance their effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.