Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40671981›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Timing and Protocols for Microbiome Intervention in Surgical Patients: A Literature Review of Current Evidence.

Nicolás Idárraga Ruiz, Carlota G Herrera Giron, Carlos Alejandro Arragan Lezama, Sergio José Frias Redroban, Manuel Omar Ventura Herrera, Gustavo Adolfo Sanic Coj

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicolás Idárraga RuizSurgery, Universidad de Manizales, Ibagué, COL.
Carlota G Herrera GironGeneral Practice, Facultad Mexicana de Medicina, Universidad La Salle, Mexico City, MEX.
Carlos Alejandro Arragan LezamaGeneral Practice, Universidad Anáhuac Xalapa, Veracruz, MEX.
Sergio José Frias RedrobanPublic Health, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Ambato, ECU.
Manuel Omar Ventura HerreraSurgery, Centro Materno Infantil del Nordeste, Santo Domingo, DOM.
Gustavo Adolfo Sanic CojGeneral Practice, Universidad San Carlos de Guatemala, Guatemala, GTM.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing the gut microbiome with a personalized approach can significantly improve surgical outcomes, leading to reduced risk of infections, improved immune function, faster recovery and healing, and decreased risk of postoperative complications. This review explores microbiome-based interventions, such as probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation, and their roles in perioperative, preoperative, and postoperative care. Electronic databases, such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, were searched using topic-related keywords and MeSH terms. The literature search was limited to English-language peer-reviewed articles within the last 10 years, but the majority of the literature was from the last five years. Microbiome interventions have been associated with reduced postoperative complications and enhanced recovery times. The study found that changing the gut microbiome in specific ways, like using probiotics and synbiotics before and after surgery, can lead to better surgical results. For example, these treatments can lower the risk of infection at the surgery site by 40%-80% compared to standard care, help patients recover their bowel function one to two days faster, and reduce hospital stays by up to 30%. They also decrease levels of important inflammation markers like IL-6 and CRP. Using probiotics and synbiotics before surgery and continuing them for two weeks can lower infection rates and enhance recovery while managing inflammation. The beneficial effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics support their use as effective strategies in perioperative care. However, people react differently to probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics because of factors like genetics, age, hormonal differences between sexes, and variations in gut microbiota based on race. Future research should focus on developing personalized microbiome-based interventions and establishing standardized protocols tailored to individual patient characteristics to enhance their effectiveness.

Indexed as

microbiome modulationmicrobiota transplantationperioperative interventionsprebioticsprobioticssurgical recoverysynbiotics

Identifiers

PMID40671981
PMCPMC12264445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.