ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
High-accuracy lung sound classification for healthy versus unhealthy diagnosis using artificial neural network.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in artificial intelligence applications for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, advancements in machine learning and electronic stethoscope technology have enabled high-precision recording and analysis of lung sounds, significantly enhancing pulmonary disease diagnosis. Methods: This study presents a comprehensive approach to classify lung sounds into healthy and unhealthy categories using a dataset collected from 112 subjects, comprising 35 healthy individuals and 77 patients with various pulmonary conditions, such as asthma, heart failure, pneumonia, bronchitis, pleural effusion, lung fibrosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), grouped as unhealthy. The dataset was obtained using a 3M Littmann® Electronic Stethoscope Model 3,200, employing three types of filters (Bell, Diaphragm, and Extended) to capture sounds across different frequency ranges. We extracted five key audio features-Spectral Centroid, Power, Energy, Zero Crossing Rate, and Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs)-from each recording to form a feature matrix. A Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) neural network was trained for binary classification. Results: The MLP neural network achieved accuracies of 98%, 100%, and 94% on the training, validation, and testing sets, respectively. This partitioning ensured the model's robustness and accuracy. Discussion: The high classification accuracy achieved by the MLP neural network suggests that this approach is a valuable decision-support tool for identifying healthy versus unhealthy lung sounds in clinical settings, facilitating early intervention while maintaining computational efficiency for offline implementation. The combination of detailed feature extraction and an optimized MLP neural network resulted in a reliable method for automated binary classification of lung sounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.