ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Challenges of using tissue engineering methods in the treatment of hypospadias.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Reconstructing the urinary tract in patients with hypospadias poses a significant clinical challenge. Despite numerous surgical approaches available, outcomes remain unsatisfactory due to the complexity of the condition and the lack of standardized conventional methods. Material requirements for reconstruction are stringent, necessitating resistance to fluids, adherence, and prevention of hair growth and strictures. Materials should also be biocompatible with the ability to control their biodegradation rate. Methods: A systemic search of PubMed database for studies between 2021 and 2024 was performed. The search terms included surgical methods hypospodia, stem cells in urethra reconstruction, polymer materials used in hypospodia, preclinical and clinical study in reconstruction of urinary system, tissue engineered methods used in urinary reconstruction. Results: Treatment options are notably limited for patients requiring lengthy urethral fragments, primarily due to the scarcity of autologous tissue, particularly penile skin. There is still debate whether using a one- or two-stage surgical procedure is more appropriate. Regardless of the surgical technique used, the number of complications increases over time. It's justify the search for new methods of urethral reconstruction Consequently, tissue engineering techniques, cell therapies, and advancements in biomaterials offer promising alternatives to traditional urinary tract reconstruction methods. However, it should be noted that at present, despite the promising results of Conclusion and clinical application: While notable advancements have occurred in tissue engineering methods, cell therapies, and modern biomaterials in recent years, the translation of laboratory findings to preclinical and clinical applications remains inadequate. This deficiency primarily stems from the absence of standardization and the relatively short duration of clinical trial follow-ups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.