ArticleDigital discovery2025
Coherent collections of rules describing exceptional materials identified with a multi-objective optimization of subgroups.
Article in Digital discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling Time-On-Stream Catalyst Reactivity in the Selective Hydrogenation of Concentrated Acetylene Streams under Industrial Conditions via Experiments and AI.ACS catalysis · 2025Article
- Rules Describing COACS catalysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Useful materials are often statistically exceptional and they might be overlooked by artificial intelligence (AI) models that attempt to describe all materials simultaneously. These global models perform well for the majority of materials, but they do not necessarily capture the useful ones. Subgroup discovery (SGD) identifies descriptions of subsets of materials associated with exceptional values of a chosen property. Thus, SGD can better capture exceptional materials compared to widely used AI techniques. Previous studies focused on the SG that maximizes an objective function establishing a tradeoff between the SG size and the exceptionality of the distribution of property values within the SG. However, this optimization does not give a unique solution, but many SGs typically have similar objective-function values. Here, we identify a "Pareto region" of SGD solutions presenting a multitude of size-exceptionality tradeoffs. The approach is demonstrated by learning descriptions of perovskites with a high bulk modulus.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.