ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Double C-Loop Haptic Lenses Are Rotationally Stable - A Systematic Review.
Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes of Double C-Loop Haptic Intraocular Lenses Across Different Optic Designs: A Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Clinical Performance of an Isofocal Toric Intraocular Lens with Double C-Loop Haptics: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of the First Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Literature Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Visual and Refractive Outcomes of a Hydrophobic Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens in Eyes with Different Axial Lengths.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to summarize the clinical rotational stability outcomes reported in patients following implantation of the POD platform with double C-loop haptics. A literature search in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) was carried out to find publications, both prospective and retrospective, which report rotational stability outcomes in patients who were implanted with this platform after cataract or refractive lens exchange surgeries. This platform is used in different commercially available intraocular lenses (IOLs), both monofocal and trifocal, made of hydrophilic or hydrophobic material. 19 clinical peer-reviewed studies published between 2013 and 2024 were included in this review. The data reported in the clinical publications was analyzed in detail, focusing on rotational stability (mean rotation values and ranges, and percentage of eyes with some degrees of rotation), measurement methods and rotation follow-up period. Our review encompassed a total of 1428 eyes implanted with the POD platform analyzed at different follow-up periods, up to a maximum of 26 months. The mean rotation across all the studies was 2.61 °.The analysis carried out in this review leads us to conclude that the POD platform provides good rotational stability when used with different IOL models based on monofocal or trifocal designs and made using hydrophilic or hydrophobic material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.