ArticleJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada2025
Understanding the Perspectives, Experiences, Beliefs, and Knowledge of Health Care Practitioners on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lyme Disease in Canada.
Article in Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Update on Lyme disease diagnostic approaches and protocols in Canada: Overview of existing testing strategies and limitations.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadienReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lyme disease (LD) is a multisystemic disease without a current approved human vaccine. Increasing infection rates have created pressure to improve the diagnosis and treatment of LD in Canada. This study aims to inform LD care through the exploration of health care practitioner (HCP) perspectives, experiences, beliefs, and knowledge of LD diagnosis and treatment. Methods: Canadian HCPs took part in bilingual (English and French) semi-structured interviews to explore their experiences and perspectives related to LD diagnosis and treatment. Major themes within and between participants were identified using inductive thematic analysis and axial coding. Results: A total of 43 HCPs working in LD-related fields participated in this study. Four major themes were identified; HCPs have: 1) Similar perspectives regarding antibiotic use, regional influences, and physician referral; 2) diverse perspectives on the use of serology testing and barriers for LD diagnosis and treatment between endemic and nonendemic regions; 3) challenges and disagreement toward diagnosing and treating chronic LD; and 4) trust in one (among several) LD guidelines, yet consult a variety of secondary sources for additional LD knowledge. Discussion: The findings reveal a pressing need for greater consistency among HCPs regarding the diagnosis and treatment of LD in Canada. Variation can be attributed to diverse beliefs, perspectives, and approaches within LD practitioners generally, but is particularly evident when addressing, acknowledging, and defining chronic LD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.