ArticleJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada2025
Evolution and Possible Explanations for the Trends in New HIV Diagnoses in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba, Compared to the Rest of Canada, 1985-2022.
Article in Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Service providers' perspectives on facilitators and recommendations for improving HIV care in Manitoba, Canada.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Canada aims to end the HIV epidemic as a public health threat by 2030. However, the provinces Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba reported 564 new HIV diagnoses in 2021 and over 600 in 2022. This study describes changes in HIV epidemiology in these three provinces compared to the rest of Canada between 1985 and 2022. Methods: This was an ecological study that used data from publicly available HIV reports published by the Governments of Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and Canada from the first reported HIV diagnoses to the latest available information. Variables of interest included number of HIV diagnoses per year (new, introduced), advanced HIV disease, proportion of diagnoses by sex (female/male), ethnicity, age, self-reported HIV mode of transmission, and mortality. We report the HIV incidence, advanced HIV disease, and mortality over time by province, and by sex, ethnicity, age, and mode of HIV transmission when data are available. Results: Canadian HIV incidence decreased over time, while new HIV diagnoses in Manitoba and Saskatchewan increased to the highest ever recorded. In Saskatchewan and Manitoba, the male-to-female ratio is 1:1, while in Alberta and Canada, it is 2:1. Indigenous people have been overrepresented in Saskatchewan and Manitoba diagnoses since 2006 and 2016, respectively. The most common modes of HIV transmission are injection drug use and heterosexual sex in Saskatchewan and Manitoba for several years, while "out-of-country" is the most common category in Alberta. The advanced HIV disease and mortality statistics have decreased over time in Canada and the three provinces. Conclusion: HIV incidence in Canada has slowly decreased; however, Manitoba and Saskatchewan have shown unprecedented increases in HIV incidence. The current epidemiology requires immediate public health action from local, provincial, and federal governments, considering that Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba contribute to about 40% of all new HIV diagnoses in Canada.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.