ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Human immuno-therapeutics for cancer treatment of dogs?
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cytokine delivery and targeting strategies in pet dogs with cancer: a comparative immuno-oncology approach.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- The Natural Killer Cell Line NK-92 and Its Genetic Variants: Impact on NK Cell Research and Cancer Immunotherapy.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunotherapy for humans has enjoyed a recent boost of treatment options that, however, has not translated into the veterinary field. Developments like monoclonal antibodies against immune checkpoint inhibitors and tumor-specific CAR-T cells have broadened treatment options for human cancer patients but the canine space has not benefited from those advancements. These novel treatments are expensive to develop for the canine market and are not necessarily promising a significant financial return for the pharmaceutical industry. Hence the question is whether there are immunotherapies that work for humans and that also have some cross-species (xenogeneic) activity in dogs, but at the same time have only minimal side effects and are affordably priced. Can such an approach be considered at all assuming that the disparity could result in an immediate rejection of the administered 'product' with all the potential side effects? Maybe this assumption is not necessarily founded on solid data and this brief review attempts to summarize of what is actually known on the treatment of canine cancers with human immuno-therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.