ArticleResearch square2025
Human DNA levels in feces reflect gut inflammation and associate with presence of gut species in IBD patients across the age spectrum.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Angiogenesis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Feces are a complex matrix that holds precious information regarding gut processes. Comprehensive fecal DNA sequencing is largely utilized as a non-invasive way to profile the gut microbiome, but is majorly overlooked in other fields. Clinical practice and research on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) would greatly benefit from accurate and non-invasive methods to monitor gut inflammation in IBD patients. In IBD, immune cell storming and epithelial cell shedding in the gut increase the amount of human DNA in feces, making fecal DNA profiling a desirable approach to monitor gut inflammation dynamics. Methods: We used a combination of sequencing techniques to comprehensively characterize the fecal DNA diversity in a newly established cohort of IBD patients and Controls (SZ cohort, N=134 children, Israel). We performed methylation-based human cell-specific profiling together with shotgun metagenomics to characterize the human and the microbial DNA content in feces, respectively. Moreover, we included a large external validation cohort (LLDeep+1000IBD cohorts, N=689 adults, the Netherlands) in order to extend our findings from the methylation-based profiling to the more broadly-available quantification of human DNA in metagenomics sequencing. Results: We found that neutrophil DNA dominates fecal human DNA content in IBD patients, and our measurements were highly correlated with fecal calprotectin levels. Combining neutrophil and other cell type DNA fractions in one metric was able to distinguish between remissive and active cases of IBD. Human reads percentage by metagenomics was well correlated with disease severity and species richness, which had distinct trends in CD and UC over time. We used a combination of species richness, human DNA percentage and microbiome composition data to predict IBD and distinguish CD from UC in both adult and pediatric IBD patient cohorts. Conclusions: The comprehensive characterization of human and microbiome fecal DNA is a useful approach to track immune response level and investigate the interaction that the immune system has with gut microbiome richness and composition over time, enriching opportunities for better disease monitoring and thus better treatment of IBD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.