Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40671807›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Patient Directed Social Media Use Among Participants of Centering Pregnancy Groups.

Alison M El Ayadi, Nadia Diamond-Smith, Mia Schuman, Laura Weil

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alison M El AyadiUniversity of California San Francisco.
Nadia Diamond-SmithUniversity of California San Francisco.
Mia SchumanUniversity of California San Francisco.
Laura WeilUniversity of California San Francisco.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001872 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COLLARD, HAROLD R, JACOBY, VANESSA · 2016 to 2025
$112.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Social support in pregnancy and postpartum is important for optimizing maternal and infant health. Group prenatal care offers the opportunity for in-person social support yet does not extend into the postpartum period. Mobile social support models may further meet the needs of pregnant persons and partners during pregnancy and into the postpartum period. However, the use and utility of mobile social support for pregnant people and their partners in the context of group prenatal care and beyond has not been studied. Assessing Centering patients' utilization of existing social media platforms can inform programmatic development. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study among recent participants of UCSF's Centering Pregnancy Results: Participants gave birth between 2018-2021 (68%), were college-educated (97.3%), and regularly accessed social media (>75% across platforms). Most participants engaged in Centering Pregnancy Discussion: The findings confirm the importance of social support, especially postpartum, for health, how mobile support groups can impact these outcomes, and needs and areas of improvement for group prenatal care. Integration of a social media support component to the evolving post-COVID Centering Pregnancy

Indexed as

antepartum caregroup prenatal care/Centering Pregnancy®health informaticsmental healthpatient educationpostpartum care

Identifiers

PMID40671807
PMCPMC12265172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.