ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Characterizing changes to individual-specific brain signature with age.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fifteen years on: a review of the Cam-CAN study of the cognitive neuroscience of ageing.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Precision neurodiversity: personalized brain network architecture as a window into cognitive variability.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases in an aging population underscores the critical need for reliable biomarkers distinguishing normal aging from pathological neurodegeneration. This study leverages neuroimaging to identify age-resilient biomarkers, establishing a baseline of neural features that are relatively stable across the aging process. Our research objectives are threefold: (a) Validate a methodology using leverage scores to identify age-robust neural signatures; (b) Confirm the consistency of these features across a diverse age cohort (18-87 years); and (c) Assess the stability of individual-specific neural characteristics across multiple brain parcellations (Craddock, AAL, and HOA). Using functional connectomes data from resting-state and task-based fMRI, we found that a small subset of features consistently capture individual-specific patterns, with significant overlap (~50%) between consecutive age groups and across atlases. Our approach effectively minimized inter-subject similarity while maintaining intra-subject consistency across different cognitive tasks. The stability of these signatures throughout adulthood and their consistency across different anatomical parcellations provide new perspectives on brain aging. They highlight both the preservation of individual brain architecture and subtle age-related reorganization. These findings enhance our understanding of age-related brain changes, potentially aiding in differentiating normal cognitive decline from neurodegenerative processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.