Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40671778›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2025

The preoperative HELPP score can be used as a prognostic assessment tool for resectable pancreatic cancer patients, and may be applicable to patients in China as well.

Jin Li, Qizhu Lin, Huangpeng Lin, Zexian Ma, Xuefeng Huang, Huimin Chen, Katsunori Sakamoto, Yongjie Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jin LiThe School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Qizhu LinDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Huangpeng LinThe School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Zexian MaThe School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Xuefeng HuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Huimin ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Katsunori SakamotoDepartment of Surgery, Kyoto University, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yongjie SuThe School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increasing annually, and the prognosis remains poor. There is currently no consensus on using neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer. Further, existing preoperative prognostic scoring tools have notable limitations, making it challenging to identify patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. There is an urgent need for a widely recognized and effective tool to assess postoperative prognosis and guide treatment decisions. This study assessed and compared several widely used indicators, including the Heidelberg prognostic pancreatic cancer (HELPP) score, the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 61 pancreatic cancer patients who underwent radical resection at Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University from February 2015 to February 2022. The SII was calculated as (platelets × neutrophils/lymphocytes), and the NLR as (neutrophils/lymphocytes). The preoperative HELPP score was derived from American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, and platelets. The GPS was based on albumin and CRP levels. Optimal cut-off values for the quantitative data were established using Youden's index. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to categorize and group the HELPP scores. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between the HELPP score, GPS, SII, NLR, and postoperative survival of the pancreatic cancer patients. Chi-squared tests were used to compare the clinicopathological data across the prognostic score subgroups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for each score was evaluated to assess predictive accuracy of 1- and 2-year survival. Results: The optimal cut-off values for the SII and NLR were 675.51 and 2.53, respectively. There were no significant differences in the survival times of the patients with HELPP scores of 1, 2, or 3 points (P>0.05); nor between those with scores of 4 and 5 points (P=0.058). The patients with preoperative HELPP scores of ≤3 points were allocated to the low HELPP score group, while those with scores >3 points were allocated to the high HELPP score group. A HELPP score >3 points, CEA ≥1.48 µg/L, and a tumor diameter >4 cm were found to be independent risk factors affecting postoperative prognosis (P<0.05). The SII, GPS, and NLR were not found to be significantly associated with prognosis. There were no statistically significant differences in the clinicopathological characteristics between the two HELPP score groups (P>0.05). The AUCs for overall survival (OS) for the HELPP score were 0.874 at 1 year and 0.696 at 2 years. Conclusions: The preoperative HELPP score is a promising tool for evaluating prognosis in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, helpful in developing more appropriate preoperative treatment.

Indexed as

Glasgow prognostic score (GPS)Heidelberg prognostic pancreatic cancer score (HELPP score)neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)systemic immune-inflammation index (SII)

Identifiers

PMID40671778
PMCPMC12261355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.