ArticleGland surgery2025
Impact of intraoperative radiotherapy
Article in Gland surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by adjuvant whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (WBRT) is a standard treatment for early-stage breast cancer, effectively reducing local recurrence and improving survival. However, WBRT involves a prolonged treatment schedule and may lead to adverse effects and reduced patient compliance. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), as a form of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), offers a shorter treatment course by delivering a single dose of radiation during surgery. Although randomized controlled trials suggest comparable survival outcomes between IORT and WBRT in selected patients, real-world evidence is limited. This study aimed to compare the effects of IORT and WBRT on survival outcomes in early-stage breast cancer patients who underwent BCS, using a population-based dataset. Methods: Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2019. Patients who received either IORT or WBRT after BCS were included. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to identify independent prognostic factors. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in OS and CSS between the IORT and WBRT groups. Factors associated with worse survival included older age, T2 stage, and higher tumor grade (all P<0.01). Positive estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status were significantly associated with improved survival (all P<0.01). Conclusions: IORT is an effective alternative to WBRT with equivalent long-term survival. IORT may be considered for eligible patients based on age, tumor size, receptor status, and grade. Prospective studies are warranted to optimize the selection criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.