ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2025
Prediction of genomic biomarkers for endometriosis using the transcriptomic dataset.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Superficial Peritoneal Endometriosis Beyond Surgical Diagnosis: A Narrative Review of Emerging Functional and Molecular Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- sMICA/sMICB and Immune Checkpoint in Endometriosis: Toward a Minimally Invasive Diagnostic Model Based on Machine Learning.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndometriosis is a clinical condition characterized by the presence of endometrial glands outside the uterine cavity. While its incidence remains mostly uncertain, endometriosis impacts around 180 million women worldwide. Despite the presentation of several epidemiological and clinical explanations, the precise mechanism underlying the disease remains ambiguous. In recent years, researchers have examined the hereditary dimension of the disease. Genetic research has aimed to discover the gene or genes responsible for the disease through association or linkage studies involving candidate genes or DNA mapping techniques.
aimTo identify genetic biomarkers linked to endometriosis by the application of machine learning (ML) approaches.
methodsThis case-control study accounted for the open-access transcriptomic data set of endometriosis and the control group. We included data from 22 controls and 16 endometriosis patients for this purpose. We used AdaBoost, XGBoost, Stochasting Gradient Boosting, Bagged Classification and Regression Trees (CART) for classification using five-fold cross validation. We evaluated the performance of the models using the performance measures of accuracy, balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and F1 score.
resultsBagged CART gave the best classification metrics. The metrics obtained from this model are 85.7%, 85.7%, 100%, 75%, 75%, 100% and 85.7% for accuracy, balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and F1 score, respectively. Based on the variable importance of modeling, we can use the genes
conclusionThis study determined possible genomic biomarkers for endometriosis using transcriptomic data from patients with/without endometriosis. The applied ML model successfully classified endometriosis and created a highly accurate diagnostic prediction model. Future genomic studies could explain the underlying pathology of endometriosis, and a non-invasive diagnostic method could replace the invasive ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.