ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2025
Clinical bladder evaluation: A new, cost-effective, clinical method for neurogenic bladder evaluation and rehabilitation.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical bladder evaluation is a cost-effective, non-invasive method for diagnosing and managing urinary dysfunction, particularly in patients with neurogenic bladder or other impairments. This process aims to assess bladder capacity, storage, and voiding functions through simple, realistic, and resource-friendly approaches. It involves a structured series of steps, from history-taking and physical examination to bladder-emptying procedures, monitoring urine leaks, assessing reflex voiding, measuring post-void residual (PVR), and calculating total bladder capacity. These evaluations help differentiate between upper motor neuron and lower motor neuron bladder dysfunction, providing critical insights for tailored management. The interpretation of findings focuses on identifying bladder type, assessing leak timing and volume, evaluating reflex voiding, and measuring PVR and total bladder capacity. The results guide interventions such as timing self-clean intermittent catheterization, adjusting fluid intake, and using bladder diaries to monitor patterns. Clinical bladder evaluation is particularly advantageous in low-resource settings, as it avoids the risks and costs associated with urodynamic studies while reflecting real-life patient conditions more effectively. Despite its benefits, no validation studies currently exist for clinical bladder assessment, and its parameters, like maximum voided volume, remain underexplored compared to urodynamic measures. Given the accessibility, affordability, and practicality of this approach, it holds promise for widespread application, especially in primary care settings and among economically disadvantaged populations. This editorial describes the process step-by-step and highlights its role in improving patient outcomes while minimizing complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.