Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40671741›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2025

Clinical bladder evaluation: A new, cost-effective, clinical method for neurogenic bladder evaluation and rehabilitation.

Raktim Swarnakar, Shiv Lal Yadav

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raktim SwarnakarFaculty of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cancer Institute, Jhajjar, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India. raktimswarnakar@hotmail.com.
Shiv Lal YadavDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical bladder evaluation is a cost-effective, non-invasive method for diagnosing and managing urinary dysfunction, particularly in patients with neurogenic bladder or other impairments. This process aims to assess bladder capacity, storage, and voiding functions through simple, realistic, and resource-friendly approaches. It involves a structured series of steps, from history-taking and physical examination to bladder-emptying procedures, monitoring urine leaks, assessing reflex voiding, measuring post-void residual (PVR), and calculating total bladder capacity. These evaluations help differentiate between upper motor neuron and lower motor neuron bladder dysfunction, providing critical insights for tailored management. The interpretation of findings focuses on identifying bladder type, assessing leak timing and volume, evaluating reflex voiding, and measuring PVR and total bladder capacity. The results guide interventions such as timing self-clean intermittent catheterization, adjusting fluid intake, and using bladder diaries to monitor patterns. Clinical bladder evaluation is particularly advantageous in low-resource settings, as it avoids the risks and costs associated with urodynamic studies while reflecting real-life patient conditions more effectively. Despite its benefits, no validation studies currently exist for clinical bladder assessment, and its parameters, like maximum voided volume, remain underexplored compared to urodynamic measures. Given the accessibility, affordability, and practicality of this approach, it holds promise for widespread application, especially in primary care settings and among economically disadvantaged populations. This editorial describes the process step-by-step and highlights its role in improving patient outcomes while minimizing complications.

Indexed as

Bladder capacityClinical bladder evaluationIncontinenceLower motor neuron bladderLow-resource settingsNeurogenic bladderPost-void residualUpper motor neuron bladderUrodynamics alternative

Identifiers

PMID40671741
PMCPMC12019086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.