Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40671654›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2025

Walkability and Mental Health Resiliency During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Karen Smith Conway, Andrea K Menclova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karen Smith ConwayDepartment of Economics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.
Andrea K MenclovaDepartment of Economics and Finance, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4387-6921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates if local walkability helped mitigate the well-documented mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Walkability may improve mental health by facilitating walking (which our data suggest occurred during the pandemic), as well as through other avenues such as time spent outdoors and improved social ties. However, estimating the causal effects of walkability is challenged by its lack of exogenous time variation. Our empirical approach uses the pandemic as a geographically-variable and arguably-random shock to mental health which, when combined with Census tract measures of walkability and mental health, sheds light on the possible impact of local walkability on mental health resiliency. Focusing on within-county, over-time variation in mental health and controlling for a wide set of local factors, results suggest that those living in a more walkable community experienced smaller declines in mental health. The magnitudes are reasonable; increasing walkability by one standard deviation is associated with a 4 percent reduction in the average pandemic-related deterioration in mental health. These findings are robust to many sensitivity checks and falsification tests. Although the pandemic is the random shock studied here, this research has implications for the potential role of walkability in diminishing the mental health effects of other stressors.

Indexed as

COVID-19Environment DesignMental HealthResilience, PsychologicalWalkingAdultBuilt EnvironmentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeighborhood CharacteristicsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID‐19mental healthstressorswalkability

Identifiers

PMID40671654
PMCPMC12412068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.