ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2025
Developing, implementing, and disseminating best practices for enhanced collection of sexual orientation and gender identity among cancer patients to catalyze innovative cancer control research.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Substantial gaps exist in person-centered care to patients who identify as sexual and gender minorities. This project's main objective was to understand acceptability, feasibility, assets, and challenges around implementation of standardized sexual orientation and gender identity measures at the patient, provider, and organizational level at one National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. This analysis focuses on sexual orientation and gender identity data collected from October 2023 to October 2024. In addition, qualitative interviews were conducted with 100 patients and 30 clinicians to evaluate the impact of these questions on clinical experience. This study found that most patients provided valid responses to gender identity, sex at birth, relationship status, preferred name, preferred pronouns, and sexual orientation questions. Examination of the qualitative data suggests 3 main themes: support for sexual orientation and gender identity measures, appreciate inclusivity, and concern about sexual orientation and gender identity measures and implications for care. Findings from this study can contribute to the foundation for evidence-based recommendations for sexual orientation and gender identity data collection to provide cancer care that meets the needs of this medically underserved community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.