ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Comparative mitochondrial genome and transcriptome analyses reveal strain-specific features of RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A trypanosome trifecta: an independently tunable triple inducible system for genetic studies inmSphere · 2026Article
- KREPA6 functions in RNA editing catalytic complex structural organization and gRNA utilization in Trypanosoma brucei.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Circular RNAs: An Under-Recognized Part in Different Scenarios of Host-Parasite Interrelationships.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Genetic origins and proteomic consequences of kinetoplast loss in trypanosomes.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Kinetoplast DNA structure, RNA editing patterns and small respiratory Complex I in Trypanosoma musculi.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Stunning Intricacies of RNA Editing Complexes RECC, RESC, and REH2C: Functional Organization, Developmental Regulation, and Evolutionary History in Kinetoplastid Protists.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNAReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trypanosoma brucei, a kinetoplastid parasite, cycles between a tsetse fly vector and a mammalian host, undergoing profound changes in cell architecture and metabolism. Central to these transitions are modifications in mitochondrial structure, volume, and energy production. The parasite's mitochondrial genome is highly complex, comprising a few maxicircles that encode proteins and rRNAs, and thousands of minicircles that encode guide RNAs (gRNAs). Most messenger RNAs (mRNAs) sustain gRNA-directed U-insertion/deletion editing to acquire functional protein-coding sequences. Although the minicircle repertoire varies among isolates and environmental conditions, the extent and biological significance of this variability in commonly used laboratory strains remain unclear. Here, we analyzed mitochondrial genomes and transcriptomes of the developmentally competent AnTat1.1 strain, the differentiation-incapable Lister 427 strain, and transgenic derivatives of Lister 427. While maxicircle sequences are broadly conserved and stable, minicircles differ markedly in sequence complexity, relative abundance, and gRNA gene content. These variations likely affect the efficiency and accuracy of mRNA editing. Compared with Lister 427, the AnTat1.1 strain retains greater minicircle diversity, longer predicted gRNA-mRNA duplexes, and higher editing fidelity. By examining cell lines with distinct developmental capacities and cultivation histories, our findings reveal how mitochondrial genomes evolve in response to changing environmental contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.