Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40671404›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2025

Multivariable machine learning prediction of risky alcohol use in contemporary youth.

Lucinda Grummitt, Rachel Visontay, Philip Clare, Tim Slade, Louise Birrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucinda GrummittThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4466-7731
Rachel VisontayThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0693-1012
Philip ClarePrevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2009-7386
Tim SladeThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1725-9188
Louise BirrellThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council Emerging Leader Investigator Grant 2016301NSW Health Prevention Research Support Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsRisky alcohol use in young adulthood is a significant public health concern. Understanding the predictors of risky drinking during this period is essential for prevention. This study aimed to measure the predictive accuracy of ensemble machine learning and identify the most important predictors of risky alcohol use in early adulthood. DESIGN AND

settingSecondary analysis of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, an Australian national longitudinal cohort study.

participantsA total of 4983 children, aged 4-5 years in 2004 (Wave 1), followed up for eight waves (to age 18/19 in 2018). MEASUREMENTS: Risky alcohol use was measured at age 18 and defined as more than 10 standard drinks per week, as per Australian National guidelines. Predictors from multiple domains-sociodemographic, adolescent substance use, adolescent mental health and behaviours, parental mental health and substance use, school factors, peer influences, parenting practices and parental stress-were included, measured from Wave 1 to 7. The SuperLearner package in R was used to test a series of models [regularised regression (LASSO, ridge and elastic net), random forest and kernel support vector machine (SVM)] using nested 10-fold cross-validation to identify the overall predictive ability of the model (measured by area under the curve; AUC) and the most important predictors of risky alcohol use across childhood and adolescence. Predictor importance was derived by normalising algorithm-specific scores per fold, weighting them by SuperLearner coefficients and aggregating across folds to rank predictors by mean weighted importance on a scale of 0 to 1 (higher scores indicating greater importance).

findingsThe ensemble model showed good prediction on the test set, with an AUC of 0.792, a slight improvement over any single algorithm (AUC = 0.783 for the best performing individual algorithm). The most important predictors were weekly drinking at the previous wave (mean weighted importance 0.999), lifetime cannabis use (0.446), lifetime parent financial stress (0.420), identifying as female (0.365), identifying as male (0.344; compared with a reference category of gender diverse), lifetime attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (0.248), pre-natal alcohol exposure (0.248), housing insecurity (0.243), religious involvement (0.238) and parent alcohol use problems (0.215).

conclusionsAn ensemble learning approach appears to have good predictive ability of risky alcohol use among a contemporary cohort of young Australians. It underscores the complex interplay of individual, familial and social factors occurring across childhood and adolescence that influences risky alcohol use in early adulthood.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingMachine LearningUnderage DrinkingAdolescentAustraliaChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleRisk FactorsRisk-TakingYoung Adultadolescencealcoholcohort studymachine learningpredictionprevention

Identifiers

PMID40671404
PMCPMC12586787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.