Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40671357›Full record

ArticleFuture medicinal chemistry2025

Green synthesis,

Sadia Khan, Sher Wali Khan, Momin Khan, Saira Nayab, Muhammad Naveed Umar, Syed Wadood Ali Shah, Haroon Ur Rashid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sadia KhanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Malakand, Chakdara Dir Lower, KPK, Pakistan.
Sher Wali KhanDepartment of Chemistry, The Rawalpindi Women University, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
Momin KhanInstitute of Pathology and Diagnostic Medicine (IPDM), Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Saira NayabDepartment of Chemistry and Green-Nano Materials Research Center, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Muhammad Naveed UmarDepartment of Chemistry, University of Malakand, Chakdara Dir Lower, KPK, Pakistan.
Syed Wadood Ali ShahDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Malakand, Chakdara Dir Lower, KPK, Pakistan.
Haroon Ur RashidCenter for Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Food Sciences, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo synthesize and assess hydrazone Schiff bases using green chemistry principles for potential antileishmanial activity. MATERIALS &

methodsSixteen hydrazone Schiff bases, including seven novel compounds (SSB2, SSB4, SSB5, RSB4, SSB14, SSB15, and SSB31), were synthesized under solvent-free conditions using grinding technique. The compounds were structurally confirmed via FT-IR,

resultsMost compounds showed moderate to good activity, with SSB28, SSB35, SSB36, and RSB4 displaying IC₅₀ values between 4 ± 0.5 and 8.0 ± 0.2 µg/mL. SSB28 was the most potent, with its IC₅₀ values of 4 ± 0.5 and 4.5 ± 0.4 µg/mL versus Promastigote and amastigote respectively as compared to the reference drug Amphotericin-B (IC

conclusionsSSB28 is an encouraging antileishmanial lead derivative with potent activity, environmental compatibility, and predicted safety making it a feasible candidate for further drug development.

Indexed as

Antiprotozoal AgentsHydrazonesLeishmania tropicaDensity Functional TheoryGreen Chemistry TechnologyMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular StructureParasitic Sensitivity TestsSchiff BasesStructure-Activity RelationshipAntiprotozoal AgentsHydrazonesSchiff BasesADMETantileishmanial activitygreen chemistrymolecular dockingSchiff base

Identifiers

PMID40671357
PMCPMC12506754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.