ArticleAnimal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho
Behavior, Welfare, and Meat Quality of Japanese Black Cattle Under Different Transportation Methods.
Article in Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Influencing Post-Transport Behavior, Physiological Responses, and Meat Quality Traits of Japanese Black Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Behavior, Welfare, and Meat Quality of Japanese Black Cattle Under Different Transportation Methods.Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan GakkaihoArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite extensive research on livestock transportation, the specific effects of different transportation methods on the behavior, welfare, and meat quality parameters of Japanese Black cattle (JBC) remain unclear. This study is the first comprehensive investigation comparing two transport methods: same farm (SF) and multiple farm (MF), while accounting for combined factors such as distance and introduction of unfamiliar animal along the journey. A total of 42 JBC steers (784 ± 81.3 kg) from three production farms (Farms A, B, and C) were observed using focal sampling at a slaughter facility. Generalized linear models (GLMs) were used to analyze the effects of two transportation methods. Results showed that cattle transported via the MF method exhibited significantly higher frequencies of drinking (p = 0.005) and eating (p = 0.005), suggesting increased fatigue. Additionally, self-grooming behavior was significantly higher in Farm B under the SF method (p = 0.002). No significant differences in meat quality parameters were observed between the two transportation methods. These findings suggest that transporting animals from SF method may help reduce transport-related stress upon arrival at the slaughter facility. Further investigation is needed to explore the physiological and economic implications of different transportation methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.