Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40671283›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025

Protocolized REDUction of Non-Resuscitation Fluids in SEptic Shock Patients. A Protocol for the REDUSE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Peter Bentzer, Anja Lindén, Markus H Olsen, Gisela Lilja, Jane Fisher, Fredrik Sjövall, Thomas Kander, Maria Lengquist, Line Samuelsson, Johan Undén and 21 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06140147 (Protocolized Reduction of Non-resuscitation Fluids Versus Usual Care in Septic Shock Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06140147 narecruitingnot on this map

Protocolized Reduction of Non-resuscitation Fluids Versus Usual Care in Septic Shock Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2023 to 2028Enrolled1,850ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsProtocolised reduction of non-resuscitation fluids, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Peter BentzerAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8783-3886
Anja LindénAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Markus H OlsenCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gisela LiljaNeurology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jane FisherAnaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik SjövallAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5612-0325
Thomas KanderAnaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5404-2981
Maria LengquistAnaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Line SamuelssonDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Östersund Hospital, Östersund, Sweden.
Johan UndénDepartment of Operation and Intensive Care, Hallands Hospital Halmstad, Halmstad, Sweden.
Ewa PalmnäsDepartment of Operation and Intensive Care, Hallands Hospital Halmstad, Halmstad, Sweden.
Jonatan OrasDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Maria CronhjortKarolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0444-8553
Anca BalintescuDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Section of Perioperative and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institute Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alicia LindDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University and Umeå Centre for Microbial Research, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Björn AhlströmDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Falun Hospital, Falun, Sweden.
Maria MeirikDepartment of Operation and Intensive Care, Hallands Hospital Varberg, Varberg, Sweden.
Johanna SavilampiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Pirkka PekkarinenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anna BerggrenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Norrtälje Hospital, Norrtälje, Sweden.
Nicklas OscarssonDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mohammed SaidDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Södertälje Hospital, Södertälje, Sweden.
Markus CastegrenCentre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Susanne FariaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden.
Linn HembergAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Adam LinderInfectious Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Miklos LipcseyAnaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1976-4129
Marcus B SkrifvarsDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0341-0262
Matt P WiseAdult Critical Care, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Niklas NielsenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden.
Janus C JakobsenCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Anna och Edwin Berger's Foundation, Lidingö, SwedenRegion Skåne, SwedenStig and Ragna Gorthon Foundation, Helsingborg, SwedenSwedish National Health Service 86626Swedish Research Counsil 2023-00257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In septic shock, administration of large fluid volumes is associated with poor outcomes. Recent evidence shows that non-resuscitation fluids are the major modifiable source of fluids for patients with septic shock in intensive care units (ICUs). This clinical trial is designed to test the hypothesis that restrictive administration of non-resuscitation fluids improves outcomes compared to usual care. Adult patients admitted to ICUs with septic shock will be randomly assigned within 12 h of admission to receive protocolized restrictive administration of non-resuscitation fluids or usual care. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 90 days. Secondary outcomes are complications during ICU stay up to 90 days (defined as any acute kidney injury or cerebral, coronary, intestinal, or limb ischemia), mechanical ventilation free days within 90 days, and for survivors cognitive function (by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MOCA-BLIND]) and Health-Related Quality of Life (by the EQ Visual Analogue Scale [EQ-VAS]), both at 6 months. In addition, the climate impact of the interventions will be assessed. To detect an absolute reduction in mortality of 7.5%, with an alpha of 5% and a power of 90%, we aim to include 1850 patients. The trial is approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. Results of primary and secondary clinical outcomes and the environmental outcome will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial Registration: NCT06140147.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyShock, SepticAdultClinical ProtocolsFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40671283
PMCPMC12267905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.