ReviewPediatric transplantation2025
Debates in Management and Treatment of CMV in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Case-Based Discussion.
Review in Pediatric transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Debates in Management and Treatment of CMV in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Case-Based Discussion.Pediatric transplantation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recently published 4th International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of CMV in Solid-Organ Transplantation offers updated recommendations for CMV prevention, treatment, and monitoring in pediatric solid organ transplant (pSOT) recipients. Although these guidelines are supported by a thorough review of published data, there remain unanswered questions due to a paucity of pediatric data, conflicting findings across studies, or areas where pediatric and adult data are divergent. The current report highlights controversial areas of management, emphasizes the rationale for certain expert opinions, and calls attention to topics that require further research using a case-based approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.