ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2025
Bacterial Dynamics in Newly Settled Acropora kenti: Insights From Inoculations With Individual Probiotic Candidates.
Article in Environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mariculture Probiotics: A Scoping Review of Research Trends, Knowledge Gaps and Opportunities.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Can Bacterial Manipulation Deliver Reef-Scale Thermal Enhancement of Corals?Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Endozoicomonas acroporae enhances coral thermal resilience through host-microbe coordination.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Bacterial Dynamics in Newly Settled Acropora kenti: Insights From Inoculations With Individual Probiotic Candidates.Environmental microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacterial probiotics hold promise for enhancing coral health and stress resilience; however, their application to coral juveniles, which are critical for restorative aquaculture, remains underexplored. Here, we show that the microbiome of newly settled Acropora kenti is amenable to manipulation, with individual probiotic candidates inducing distinct microbiome responses that differed in their stability after the final inoculation. Three of the eight tested strains, Halomonas smyrnensis, Endozoicomonas acroporae and Roseivivax lentus, remained prevalent in the microbiome at least 5 days post-inoculation. Notably, aggregates of Endozoicomonas cells were observed exclusively in the corresponding treatment, marking the first report of coral-associated microbial aggregates (CAMAs) in early life stage acroporids and the first induced through bacterial manipulation. In the Pseudoalteromonas rubra treatment, the inoculum was detected at low relative abundance but induced a microbiome shift that persisted beyond the final inoculation. While no significant coral health benefits were observed in this short 17-day experiment, the Ruegeria arenilitoris strain unexpectedly induced tissue regression and mortality. The described experimental system offers a systematic approach for tracking bacterial dynamics in newly settled corals, facilitating the identification of potentially beneficial strains and the exclusion of harmful ones to inform the design of probiotic consortia for coral aquaculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.