Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40671216›Full record

ArticleMacromolecular rapid communications2025

Effect of Photoinitiation Process on Photo-Crosslinking of Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogel Networks.

Doğukan Duymaz, İsmail Can Karaoğlu, Seda Kizilel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Macromolecular rapid communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Doğukan DuymazChemical and Biological Engineering, Koç University, Sariyer, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6039-0098
İsmail Can KaraoğluChemical and Biological Engineering, Koç University, Sariyer, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3004-7742
Seda KizilelChemical and Biological Engineering, Koç University, Sariyer, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9092-2698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) has emerged as a widely utilized biomaterial in tissue engineering due to its tunable mechanical properties, cell-adhesive motifs, and photo-crosslinkability. However, the physicochemical characteristics and biomedical utility of GelMA hydrogels are greatly influenced by the choice and concentration of photoinitiating systems. Despite increasing acceptance of visible-light and UV-sensitive initiators, a systematic comparative evaluation of their impact on GelMA hydrogel properties has not been studied. In this study, we present the first systematic investigation of how individual photoinitiators, Eosin Y (EY), Lithium Phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate (LAP), Ruthenium (II) trisbipyridyl chloride ([RuII(bpy)

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCross-Linking ReagentsGelatinHydrogelsMethacrylatesAnimalsCell SurvivalLightMiceNIH 3T3 CellsPhotochemical ProcessesBiocompatible MaterialsCross-Linking ReagentsGelatingelatin methacryloylHydrogelsMethacrylatesEYgelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)hydrogelsLAPoptimizationphoto‐crosslinkingphoto‐initiatorruthenium

Identifiers

PMID40671216
PMCPMC12536395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.