ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2025
Introducing a Professional Development Skill Building Platform Into a Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program Curriculum in Pharmacology.
Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing eXcellence Through Community, Empowerment, and Learning (EXCEL): a Pilot Study of a Self-Determination Theory-Informed Peer-Facilitated Psychoeducational Intervention for Health Sciences Trainees.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- Editorial: Pharmacology Education Special Issue.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Article
- Introducing a Professional Development Skill Building Platform Into a Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program Curriculum in Pharmacology.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomedical graduate students are training for diverse careers that extend beyond the academic environment. However, many graduate programs are designed to train individuals in a specialized scientific field, and the main research project of trainees is often narrow in scope, with a focus on a specific topic of intense study. To be effective in the scientific workforce, trainees need skills beyond what is learned through bench science and critical thinking that supports scientific discovery. Generalizing critical thinking to improve interpersonal interactions through communication, emotional intelligence, and an understanding of the environment in shaping career development is similarly crucial for professional success. To prepare trainees beyond the typical focused scientific project and training, this manuscript describes the process and outcomes for a graduate program in pharmacology that piloted a course containing intentionally designed curriculum to reach beyond the traditional scope of training and provide skills-based professional and career development training. Here, we share the course design, feedback from students across 5 years, and lessons learned about implementing this type of strategy. Each year, students were provided short voluntary surveys to complete, and the surveys were used to determine whether students thought the material was relevant and helped them to be better scientists. The surveys were also used to create the course syllabus each semester in a semi-on-demand fashion. Overall, data suggest that the students perceived that the course is beneficial and that it is challenging to address all needs at all times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.