Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40671184›Full record

ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2025

Introducing a Professional Development Skill Building Platform Into a Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program Curriculum in Pharmacology.

Elizabeth S Yeh, Jennelle D Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Editorial: Pharmacology Education Special Issue.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth S YehDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2940-3178
Jennelle D RichardsonDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical graduate students are training for diverse careers that extend beyond the academic environment. However, many graduate programs are designed to train individuals in a specialized scientific field, and the main research project of trainees is often narrow in scope, with a focus on a specific topic of intense study. To be effective in the scientific workforce, trainees need skills beyond what is learned through bench science and critical thinking that supports scientific discovery. Generalizing critical thinking to improve interpersonal interactions through communication, emotional intelligence, and an understanding of the environment in shaping career development is similarly crucial for professional success. To prepare trainees beyond the typical focused scientific project and training, this manuscript describes the process and outcomes for a graduate program in pharmacology that piloted a course containing intentionally designed curriculum to reach beyond the traditional scope of training and provide skills-based professional and career development training. Here, we share the course design, feedback from students across 5 years, and lessons learned about implementing this type of strategy. Each year, students were provided short voluntary surveys to complete, and the surveys were used to determine whether students thought the material was relevant and helped them to be better scientists. The surveys were also used to create the course syllabus each semester in a semi-on-demand fashion. Overall, data suggest that the students perceived that the course is beneficial and that it is challenging to address all needs at all times.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, GraduatePharmacologyHumansbiomedicalcareercurriculumgraduatepharmacologyprofessional development

Identifiers

PMID40671184
PMCPMC12266985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.