Observational studyOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on epistaxis and anaemia in patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) in central South Africa.
Observational study in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent epistaxis, which frequently results in iron deficiency anaemia and impaired quality of life, is the most frequent complication of hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). Specific data to guide rare disease management during a pandemic such as COVID-19 are lacking.
methodsTo better define the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HHT, we conducted a retrospective and prospective observational descriptive review of HHT patients in central South Africa. Epistaxis severity scores (ESSs) and haemoglobin (Hb) levels before and after the start of the pandemic were compared. Variables that may have influenced epistaxis severity and anaemia were investigated, viz. (i) mask use, (ii) nasal versus oral swabs to test for SARS-CoV-2, (iii) COVID-19 disease and (iv) its management, (v) COVID-19 vaccines, and (vi) the social impact of the pandemic.
resultsTwenty-four patients with confirmed HHT were included in the study. Subset analyses revealed a clinically significant change in ESSs (≥ 0.71 minimal important difference) and Hb levels (> 2.7% biologic variation) in 6/11 (54.6%) and 12/15 (80%) patients. While the median ESS improved in 2/11 (18.2%) patients, it worsened in 4/11 (36.4%) patients during the pandemic. However, the changes in the median ESS (2.25 pre-pandemic versus 2.5 during the pandemic; p = 0.38) and Hb level (9.5 g/dL pre-pandemic versus 10 g/dL during the pandemic; p = 0.38) for the study population were not statistically significant. Clinical and social variables that may influence epistaxis severity and anaemia were identified. Nasal swab testing for SARS-CoV-2 induced epistaxis in 9/12 (75%) cases and was noted as an important factor.
conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has had a clinically significant impact on epistaxis severity and anaemia in some individuals with HHT in central South Africa. Specific strategies are needed to optimise the management of HHT during the COVID-19 and future respiratory pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.