ArticleBMC medical education2025
Knowledge and perception of artificial lntelligence education among undergraduate healthcare students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of artificial intelligence in medical education: Saudi Arabian perspective.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is gaining recognition for its ability to enhance patient outcomes in healthcare. Therefore, integrating AI into the undergraduate curriculum is essential to equip students with foundational knowledge before graduation. This study investigated the knowledge and perceptions of AI education among undergraduate healthcare students.
methodsThis cross-sectional study targeted students from various health colleges in Saudi Arabia and was conducted from January 1, 2024, to April 30, 2024. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire comprising three sections: demographics, knowledge, and perceptions of AI. We utilized a convenience sampling technique to distribute the survey. Descriptive analysis was performed to assess the baseline characteristics, and a multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify the covariates that significantly influence knowledge scores.
resultsA total of 303 students participated in our study, including 142 pharmacy and 161 non-pharmacy students. Non-pharmacy students demonstrated significantly greater knowledge of AI than pharmacy students (p = 0.0084). Positive perceptions of AI were more prevalent than negative perceptions among all participants (p = 0.0062). Pharmacy and non-pharmacy students held significantly different knowledge of advanced AI skills (p = 0.0019) and the importance of AI applications (p = 0.0259). Additionally, there were significant differences in perceptions regarding the belief that AI-powered medical devices would help healthcare providers reduce medical errors (p = 0.0279).
conclusionsHealthcare students recognize the benefit of AI in enhancing patient outcomes but lack practical knowledge of its medical applications. They believe integrating AI education into their curriculum is essential for acquiring skills before graduation. Therefore, enhancing AI training may foster innovation, enhance patient outcomes, and align with the evolving demands of the healthcare sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.