ArticleAnnals of general psychiatry2025
Italian validation of the Orbach and Mikulincer Mental Pain Scale-8 (OMMP-8).
Article in Annals of general psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMental pain is increasingly recognized in clinical settings as a significant transdiagnostic construct that can exacerbate the condition of individuals suffering from it. It is also widely acknowledged as one of the strongest indicators of suicide risk. This study focuses on the Italian validation of the Orbach and Mikulincer Mental Pain Scale-8 (OMMP-8).
methodsA total of 1,546 participants responded to an online cross-sectional survey assessing sociodemographic and clinically relevant variables, mental pain and other mental health variables (i.e., tolerance for mental pain, current physical pain, anxiety and depression, and wellbeing).
resultsThe Italian version of the OMMP-8 maintained the same factorial structure as the original instrument and demonstrated excellent convergent validity. Moreover, the instrument showed strong criterion validity, effectively distinguishing between individuals receiving mental health treatment, those with recent suicidal ideation, and those with a history of suicide attempts. ROC curve analyses indicated good discrimination for recent suicidal ideation (AUC = 0.81) and acceptable discrimination for suicide attempt history (AUC = 0.71), with an optimal cut-off score of ≥ 21.5. In addition, the Italian OMMP-8 demonstrated incremental validity, predicting suicidal ideation and past suicide attempts after controlling for depressive symptoms. It also exhibited scale measurement invariance for gender, age, current mental health treatment, and current suicidal ideation while residual invariance was established for gender, age, and treatment status.
conclusionThe Italian OMMP-8 is an agile, valid, and reliable instrument for assessing mental pain and shows promise in identifying individuals at risk of suicide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.