ArticleBMC medical education2025
Enhancing thai fifth-year medical students' knowledge and attitudes toward palliative care through active learning methods.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPalliative care is an essential component of holistic medical education, addressing physical, psychological, social, and spiritual needs in patients with life-limiting illnesses. However, medical students often report inadequate training and low confidence in providing palliative care. Active learning methods, including team-based learning (TBL), flipped classrooms (FC), and experiential learning via home visits, have been proposed to enhance palliative care education. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of these active learning strategies in improving the knowledge and attitudes of fifth-year medical students toward palliative care.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine of the Prince of Songkla University in Thailand. Fifth-year medical students participated in a structured palliative care curriculum integrating TBL, FC, and experiential learning via palliative home visits. Changes in their knowledge and attitudes were measured using pre- and post-course questionnaires, which were validated by experts and pilot-tested for reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.71). Data analysis employed paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to evaluate changes in knowledge and attitudes.
resultsA total of 251 students completed the pre-test, with 62 of them also completing the post-tests. Significant improvements were observed in the students' knowledge of palliative care principles (p < 0.001), assessment techniques (p < 0.001), pain management (p < 0.001), and advance care planning (p < 0.001), while no significant changes were noted in their knowledge of physical (p = 0.726) or psychological symptom management (p = 0.594). Attitudinal changes included decreased perception of the difficulty of palliative care (p < 0.001) and increased recognition of its necessity (p < 0.001). However, students also reported significantly higher levels of emotional stress (p = 0.006) and increased feelings of hopelessness (p = 0.008). In contrast, their confidence in managing end-of-life care did not improve significantly (p = 0.238).
conclusionsIntegrating TBL, FC, and experiential learning significantly enhanced students' knowledge and corrected misconceptions about palliative care. However, the emotional burden of palliative care remained a challenge, highlighting the need for coping skill training and additional support in medical curricula. Future research should explore longitudinal interventions which might better reinforce confidence in end-of-life care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.