ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
A novel machine learning architecture to improve classification of intermediate cases in health: workflow and case study for public health.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe practice of medicine has evolved significantly during the past decade, with the emergence of Machine Learning (ML) that offers the opportunity of personalized patient-tailored care. However, ML models still face some challenges when classifying patients where clear-cut boundaries between classes are hard to identify. In this work, we propose an ML architecture to improve the sensitivity of detecting patients in intermediate "hard-to-classify" classes.
methodsThe proposed architecture replaces a single classifier with a group of cascaded increasingly specialized classifiers: the 'Human-like', the 'Segregating', and the 'Deep' classifiers. Its effectiveness is tested, using 8 ML algorithms (Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbor, Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, CatBoost, and Artificial Neural Network) to predict the feeling of protection among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, based on a global online survey, then validated on two other outputs.
resultsThe results show, for most algorithms, an enhanced detection of data points belonging to intermediate classes (up to 14% absolute increase in accuracy), as well as an overall improvement in the models' accuracies (up to 5.8% absolute increase). The validation experiments yielded similar results with improved accuracies for most algorithms when compared to the single classifier architecture.
conclusionThis novel architecture is proving to be a very promising tool for improving accuracy of the models when classifying patients in intermediate classes, regardless of the algorithm used. Accuracy-improvement for likert-type scale measures offers an opportunity for rapidly identifying "risk-profiles" during emergencies and beyond. This applies equally to patients and healthcare providers, with potential for improving quality of care and strengthening patient-centered healthcare systems that prioritize healthcare providers' wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.