ArticleBMC oral health2025
Development and evaluation of a deep learning-based system for dental age estimation using the demirjian method on panoramic radiographs.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Third Molar Segmentation Performance Across Dental Developmental Stages and the 18-Year Age Threshold Using Deep Learning Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- First-stage assessment of AI-based anatomical measurement accuracy for the Cameriere European dental age estimation method.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Dentistry: Current Applications, Emerging Trends, and Future Directions.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Age estimation from pubic symphysis based on cinematic volume rendering: comparison between Suchey-Brooks staging and deep learning.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Can ChatGPT-5 estimate dental age? A comparative study with Demirjian and Willems methods in paediatric dentistry.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Clinically interpretable deep learning for pediatric dental age estimation with explainable AI.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based dental age estimation in adolescents using panoramic radiographs: a comparative study with traditional methods.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Bio-inspired neutrosophic-enzyme intelligence framework for pediatric dental disease detection using multi-modal clinical data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Associations Between Diet, Oral Health, and General Development in Romanian School-Age Children.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo develop and evaluate a deep learning-based model for automatic dental age estimation using the Demirjian method on panoramic radiographs, and to compare its performance with the traditional manual approach. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 4,800 panoramic radiographs (mean age: 10.64 years) were used to train, validate, and test a YOLOv11-based deep learning model for tooth development staging. Model performance was evaluated using precision, recall, F1 score, and mAP metrics. In addition, a separate dataset of 650 individuals (325 females, 325 males) was used to compare chronological age, manual Demirjian assessments, and AI-assisted estimations through repeated-measures ANOVA and linear regression analysis.
resultsThe model achieved its highest performance in the 2nd Molar-H group (Precision: 0.99, Recall: 1.0, F1: 0.995), and its lowest in the 1st Molar-B group (Precision: 0.471, F1: 0.601). Both manual and AI-assisted Demirjian methods significantly overestimated chronological age (p < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed between them (p = 0.433). Regression analysis indicated a weak but statistically significant relationship between age and prediction error, more pronounced in the AI-assisted model (R² = 0.042).
conclusionThe AI-assisted system demonstrated comparable accuracy to the manual Demirjian method and showed higher performance in later stages of tooth development. The developed Python script and graphical interface allow for rapid, scalable, and user-friendly application of the method. While the system shows promise for use in clinical and forensic settings, broader validation with diverse populations and alternative model architectures is recommended before clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.