ArticleBMC cancer2025
An end-to-end interpretable machine-learning-based framework for early-stage diagnosis of gallbladder cancer using multi-modality medical data.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Programmed death 1 antibody drug conjugates (PD 1 ADCs): Innovations in overcoming resistance and enhancing immune mediated antitumor activity.Translational oncology · 2026Review
- Interpretable deep learning for rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy diagnosis: a multi-center study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A novel machine learning-based model for precise prediction of postoperative recurrence in gallbladder cancer: development and multicenter validation across four centers.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Advancing Precision, Accuracy, and Early Detection in Cancer Diagnosis.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe accurate early-stage diagnosis of gallbladder cancer (GBC) is regarded as one of the major challenges in the field of oncology. However, few studies have focused on the comprehensive classification of GBC based on multiple modalities. This study aims to develop a comprehensive diagnostic framework for GBC based on both imaging and non-imaging medical data.
methodsThis retrospective study reviewed 298 clinical patients with gallbladder disease or volunteers from two devices. A novel end-to-end interpretable diagnostic framework for GBC is proposed to handle multiple medical modalities, including CT imaging, demographics, tumor markers, coagulation function tests, and routine blood tests. To achieve better feature extraction and fusion of the imaging modality, a novel global-hybrid-local network, namely GHL-Net, has also been developed. The ensemble learning strategy is employed to fuse multi-modality data and obtain the final classification result. In addition, two interpretable methods are applied to help clinicians understand the model-based decisions. Model performance was evaluated through accuracy, precision, specificity, sensitivity, F1-score, area under the curve (AUC), and matthews correlation coefficient (MCC).
resultsIn both binary and multi-class classification scenarios, the proposed method showed better performance compared to other comparison methods in both datasets. Especially in the binary classification scenario, the proposed method achieved the highest accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, and MCC of 95.24%, 93.55%, 96.87%, 96.67%, 95.08%, 0.9591, 0.9636, and 0.9051, respectively. The visualization results obtained based on the interpretable methods also demonstrated a high clinical relevance of the intermediate decision-making processes. Ablation studies then provided an in-depth understanding of our methodology.
conclusionThe machine learning-based framework can effectively improve the accuracy of GBC diagnosis and is expected to have a more significant impact in other cancer diagnosis scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.