ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2025
Positive selection on rare variants of IGF1R and BRD4 underlying the cold adaptation of wild boar.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wild boar (Sus scrofa) meat quality research at the crossroads of genetics and nutrition: a global bibliometric mapping.Food science of animal resources · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDomestic piglets often die of hypothermia, whereas Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) thrives from tropical lowlands to subarctic forests. The thermoregulation of wild boar offers a natural experiment to uncover the genetic basis of cold adaptation.
methodsWe conducted whole-genome resequencing on wild populations from cold regions (northern and northeastern Asia, with six samples) and warm regions (southeastern Asia and southern China, with five samples). By integrating publicly available data, we compiled a core dataset of 48 wild boar samples and an extended dataset of 445 wild boar and domestic pig samples to identify candidate genes related to cold adaptation. To investigate the functional effects of two candidate variants under positive selection, we performed CUT&Tag and RNA-seq using the northeastern Asian Min pig breed as a proxy for a cold-adapted population.
resultsOur study identified candidate genes associated with cold adaptation, which are significantly enriched in thermogenesis, fat cell development, and adipose tissue pathways. We discovered two enhancer variants under positive selection: an intronic variant of IGF1R (rs341219502) and an exonic variant of BRD4 (rs327139795). These variants exhibited the highest differentiation between populations of wild boar and domestic pigs in cold and warm region populations. Furthermore, these rare variants were absent in outgroup species and warm-region wild boars but were nearly fixed in cold-region populations. The H3K27ac CUT&Tag profiling revealed that the rs341219502 variant of IGF1R is linked to the gain of novel binding sites for three transcription factors involving regulatory changes in enhancer function. In contrast, the rs327139795 variant of BRD4 may result in the loss of a phosphorylation site due to an alteration in the amino acid sequence.
conclusionOur study identified candidate genes for cold adaptation in wild boar. The variant rs341219502 in the IGF1R enhancer and the variant rs327139795 in the BRD4 exon, both of which were under positive selection and nearly fixed in populations from cold regions, suggest they may have originated de novo in these populations. Further analysis indicated that rs341219502 could influence enhancer function, while rs327139795 may affect amino acid alterations. Overall, our study highlights the adaptive evolution of genomic molecules that contribute to the remarkable environmental flexibility of wild boar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.