ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Prognostic factors for local failure and overall survival in patients with epidural disease at the cauda equina following stereotactic body radiotherapy: a clinical, anatomic and dosimetric analysis.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe relationship between spine SBRT outcomes and the extent of epidural cauda equina compression (ECEC) by malignant epidural disease has yet to be reported. Our objective was to determine clinical, anatomic and dosimetric factors that predict for local failure (LF) and overall survival (OS) specific to ECEC.
methodsConsecutive patients with ECEC treated with spine SBRT were retrospectively reviewed. ECEC parameters including anatomic measurements, lumbar stenosis grading, anatomic disease position and various dosimetric factors, were analyzed for their prognostic utility. Covariates with a p-value ≤ 0.20 on univariate analysis were selected for multivariable analysis (MVA), and those statistically significant (p < 0.05) were included in the final model.
resultsNinety-four spinal segments (79 patients) with ECEC were identified, 69 (73%) were intact (non-operated) and 25 (27%) post-operative. MVA identified a significantly lower risk of LF with systemic-therapy prior to SBRT (HR 0.164, p = 0.0005), ECEC encompassing ≤ 1/3 of the circumference of the spinal canal (HR 0.216, p = 0.0194) and an epidural disease volume < 0.45cm
conclusionThe volume and circumferential extent of epidural disease within the spinal canal are important factors for LF in ECEC treated by SBRT, suggesting a possible therapeutic role for surgical cytoreduction to enable optimal treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40670813What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.