Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40670804›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2026

AMPred-MFG: Investigating the Mutagenicity of Compounds Using Motif-Based Graph Combined with Molecular Fingerprints and Graph Attention Mechanism.

Jinpeng Hu, Xin Yang, Chenggui Yao, Mingxuan Zhang, Shihang Shen, Lijie Na, Qi Zhao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jinpeng Hu *School of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan, 114051, China.
Xin Yang *School of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan, 114051, China.
Chenggui YaoCollege of Data Science, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, 314000, China.
Mingxuan ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan, 114051, China.
Shihang ShenSchool of AI and Advanced Computing, XJTLU Entrepreneur College (Taicang), Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, 215123, China.
Lijie NaSchool of Economics and Law, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan, 114051, China. nalijie@ustl.edu.cn.
Qi ZhaoSchool of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan, 114051, China. zhaoqi@lnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9713-1864

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Liaoning Universities LJ212410146026Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province 2023-MS-288Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LY24A050003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate mutagenicity prediction is crucial in drug discovery, but evaluating the mutagenicity of drug molecules is technically challenging, and experimental mutagenicity tests are both time-consuming and costly. In this study, we introduce a new deep learning predictive model called AMPred-MFG, designed to predict the mutagenicity of drug molecules. Our approach first combines multiple molecular fingerprint features with molecular graph features to obtain a comprehensive molecular representation. Next, considering the significance of molecular substructures on mutagenicity, we decompose the molecules into motifs to form motif-based graph. We use a graph transformer to extract features from these motif-based graphs and fuse motif graph features with molecular fingerprint features and molecular graph features to create the final molecular representation. Finally, we use a multilayer perceptron to classify the compounds into mutagens and non-mutagens. We evaluate the performance of AMPred-MFG through ten-fold cross-validation experiments and validate its robustness on external validation datasets. By comparing with several state-of-the-art algorithms, AMPred-MFG achieves the best results in terms of performance, with AUC value of 0.912, ACC of 0.835, SEN of 0.849, NPV of 0.811, PPV of 0.854, MCC of 0.665. In addition, we use attention scores to identify molecular fragments related to mutagenicity, highlighting the interpretability of AMPred-MFG. We believe that AMPred-MFG can act as a dependable tool for predicting mutagenicity, allowing for the assessment of both mutagens and non-mutagens during the early phases of drug development. AMPred-MFG is freely available at https://github.com/zhaoqi106/AMPred-MFG .

Indexed as

Deep LearningMutagensAlgorithmsMultilayer PerceptronsMutagenicity TestsPrediction AlgorithmsMutagensAttention mechanismDrug discoveryMolecular fingerprintMotif-based graphMutagenicity prediction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.