Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40670761›Full record

Trial reportCalcified tissue international2025

Effect of A Patient Reminder Program on Adherence in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis Receiving Oral Bisphosphonate Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Control Trial.

U Stumpf, I Kyvernitakis, K Horas, P Hadji

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Calcified tissue international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

U StumpfDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Ulla.stumpf@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3141-1032
I KyvernitakisDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.
K HorasFrankfurt Center of Bone Health and Endocrinology and Orthopedic Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
P HadjiFrankfurt Center of Bone Health and Endocrinology and Phillipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

Procter and Gamble P&GP GermanyProcter and Gamble PI Prof. Hadji
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor adherence to oral bisphosphonate therapy remains a major challenge in the treatment of osteoporosis, substantially reducing therapeutic efficacy. While reminder interventions have been proposed as a method to enhance adherence, evidence remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of written and verbal reminders on medication adherence compared to standard patient care over a 12-month period in a real-world clinical setting. In this randomized controlled study, 180 postmenopausal women diagnosed with osteoporosis were assigned to one of three groups: standard care (control), written reminder, or verbal reminder. Interventions were administered at five standardized time points. Adherence was defined as intake of ≥80% of prescribed weekly doses (≥42 out of 52 doses) and a ≥35% reduction in serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) levels from baseline to 12 months. No significant differences in adherence rates were observed between groups: 53.2% in the control group, 52.0% in the written reminder group, and 52.7% in the verbal reminder group (χ

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesMedication AdherenceOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalReminder SystemsAdministration, OralAgedBone DensityCollagen Type IFemaleHumansMiddle AgedBone Density Conservation AgentsCollagen Type IDiphosphonatesAdherenceOral bisphosphonatesOsteoporosisPatient reminder program

Identifiers

PMID40670761
PMCPMC12267344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.