Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40670753›Full record

ArticleAmbio2026

Navigating local relevance in transdisciplinary research: Exploring climate and environmental change in the Tasiilaq region, East Greenland.

Sophie Elixhauser, Jorrit van der Schot

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sophie ElixhauserDepartment of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1010, Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jorrit van der SchotAustrian Polar Research Institute (APRI), Vienna, Austria. jorrit.van-der-schot@uni-graz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5237-0639

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE 2020 research and innovation programme 101003766HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 885646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transdisciplinary research aims to produce knowledge relevant to scientists and non-academic stakeholders alike, a challenging task given the parties' divergent epistemologies and the attendant time and resource constraints. In Tasiilaq, East Greenland, our group of climate scientists and anthropologists set out to study climate and environmental change and the impact on the local community of changes in precipitation from less snow to more rain. We describe how our project team tried to make the project relevant to our collaborators, and the tension that arose between scientific and local relevance, which proved difficult to resolve. Our experience also points to some fundamental frictions in transdisciplinary research and limitations of conventional project and funding schemes. We recommend that transdisciplinary projects should be co-created by all partners from the outset to ensure equal participation and to avoid the difficult, sometimes intractable task, of rebalancing scientific and local relevance at a later stage.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeInterdisciplinary ResearchGreenlandHumansClimate and environmental changeCo-creationGreenlandParticipationRelevanceTransdisciplinary research

Identifiers

PMID40670753
PMCPMC12673011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.