ArticleAnimal cognition2025
The duration of alarm- and territorial defence calls alters receiver response in Eurasian magpies.
Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: vocal communication in corvids.Animal cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animals use vocal signals to provide information across a wide range of contexts. However, it is more complex to identify the information content when the same vocalizations are produced in different contexts, such as against predators and conspecific competitors. This raises the question whether information about the caller or context can be coded in relatively subtle variation within the call type and whether receivers respond differentially to such variation. Using playbacks of the general ‘chatter’ alarm call of Eurasian magpies (Pica pica), we tested whether or not territorial magpies respond differently to variation in call duration and rate. We show that magpies responded acoustically faster to chatters of longer duration, which may signal a greater motivation or urgency of territorial intruders. Alternatively, a delay in chatter response to shorter calls may reflect a period of hesitation and risk avoidance. Interestingly, magpies did not approach the loudspeaker more closely in response to longer calls and the total chatter response did not differ either. This suggests that after the short initial response, the persistence of the signal over time as well as visual information on the level or type of danger become essential for more differentiated response behaviours. Taken together, our results show that magpies perceive and respond differentially to variation in alarm call duration, suggesting that such variation encodes meaningful information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.