ArticleScientific reports2025
Image quality and radiation dose of reduced-dose abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) with silver filter and deep learning reconstruction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-respiratory-phase low-dose quantitative CT for assessing COPD severity.Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Initial experience of deep learning reconstruction algorithm in lung kernel: clinical usefulness for lung nodules at ultra-low-dose protocol.European radiology · 2026Article
- Vendor-agnostic versus vendor-specific boost methods in low-concentration contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Shifting from black box decisions to informed decision-making in using artificial intelligence to analyze prostate MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- CT Radiation Dose Reduction With Preserved Diagnostic Performance: How Far Have We Come Over 25 Years?AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the image quality and radiation dose between reduced-dose CT with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) using SilverBeam filter and standard dose with iterative reconstruction (IR) in abdominopelvic CT. In total, 182 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 63 ± 14 years; 100 men) were included. Standard-dose scanning was performed with a tube voltage of 100 kVp, automatic tube current modulation, and IR reconstruction, whereas reduced-dose scanning was performed with a tube voltage of 120 kVp, a SilverBeam filter, and DLR. Additionally, a contrast-enhanced (CE)-boost image was obtained for reduced-dose scanning. Radiation dose, objective, and subjective image analyses were performed in each body mass index (BMI) category. The radiation dose for SilverBeam with DLR was significantly lower than that of standard dose with IR, with an average reduction in the effective dose of 59.0% (1.87 vs. 4.57 mSv). Standard dose with IR (10.59 ± 1.75) and SilverBeam with DLR (10.60 ± 1.08) showed no significant difference in image noise (p = 0.99). In the obese group (BMI > 25 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.