ArticleScientific reports2025
Phytochemical profiling and antioxidant capacity of Achillea Santolina at different phenological stages.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoencapsulation of Basil (Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Chemical Composition and Synergistic Antimicrobial Activity ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitory Potential ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Functional and Organic Foods in Enhancing the Oral and Dental Health and Hygiene-A Comprehensive Review.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Article
- A Comparative Analysis of Nutritional Composition inFood science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the present study, the phytochemical quantity and quality as well as the antioxidant capacity of Achillea santolina at different growth stages including vegetative, flowering, and fruit set were investigated. The leave methanolic extraction of harvested plants at the flowering stage showed the highest phenolic and flavonoids content. The content and composition of A. santolina essential oil was varied depending on the plant development stage. The highest essential oil content (0.3% v/w) was obtained in the harvested aerial parts at the flowering stage followed by fruit set and vegetative stages. According to results of GC-FID and GC-MS, oxygenated monoterpenes represented by 1,8-cineole, α-thujone, and camphor were the predominant compounds in the A. santolina essential oil, which comprised 69.63-88.61% of the total oil composition. The essential oil quality of A. santolina was varied during the growing season and the observed variation was related to the differences in concentrations of main compounds and occurrence of minor constituents. An ascending and descending trend respectively was found regard to monoterpene and sesquiterpene contents during the growing life cycle of A. santolina and the highest ratio of these compounds was obtained at the fruit set stage. The total phenol content and antioxidant capacity of A. santolina essential oils gradually increased during the plant growth period that reached a maximum value at the fruit set stage. According to obtained results, appropriate harvesting stage can be chosen based on application purpose regards to essential oil quantity or quality. The results suggests that the flowering and fruit set stages can be considered as suitable sources of highest essential oil content and antioxidant potential, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.