ArticleScientific reports2025
Injury-specific pathways shape corneal nerve regeneration dynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ocular Surface Inflammation as a Driver of Cornea Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency: Mechanisms and Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Immune cell dynamics and cytokine regulation in cornea and transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Current Landscape and Future Prospects of Corneal Regenerative Medicine.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Investigation of conjunctival vasculature changes assessed by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography after photorefractive keratectomy: a pilot study.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cornea, a transparent tissue critical for clear vision, is uniquely characterized by a dense network of peripheral sensory nerves. This innervation not only enables sensation but also provides vital trophic support, ensuring corneal health and integrity. Damage or loss of these peripheral nerves leads to neurotrophic keratitis (NK), a debilitating condition that disrupts corneal healing and function, ultimately threatening vision. Remarkably similar to other peripheral neuropathies, NK arises from various injuries, diseases, or surgical interventions, yet its underlying regenerative mechanisms remain poorly understood, limiting effective treatment options. In this study, we investigated how corneal nerves regenerate following two different types of clinically relevant injuries-axotomy (mimicking nerve damage during corneal transplantation) and epithelial abrasion (resembling superficial corneal surgery). We found that the type of injury distinctly influences both the structural and functional recovery of corneal nerves. Axotomy resulted in delayed nerve regeneration, significant disruption of epithelial cell homeostasis, and increased risk of severe corneal damage. Conversely, epithelial abrasion induced rapid but structurally abnormal nerve recovery. Furthermore, we identified specific molecular pathways activated differently depending on injury type. Our findings highlight the complexity of peripheral nerve regeneration, underscoring the necessity for targeted therapeutic strategies tailored to individual injury scenarios. By illuminating the variability in nerve recovery, our study provides valuable insights applicable not only to NK but potentially to a broader spectrum of peripheral neuropathies, paving the way for novel therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.